Labels:text | number | screenshot | font | menu OCR: TABLE 7 METRICS PENETRATION LEVELS Total Manager Developer Question Question Question Question Question Question One Two One Two One Two ES 18 ES ES IS ES ES IS ES IS Function points! 86 15 10 85 11 Metrics for size estimates* 8 50 11 90 57 60 13 20 Metrics for cost estimates" 90 80 30 26 90 85 50 56 10 Metrics for effort estimates" 70 65 27 90 77 60 42 50 54 10 Analysis inspection data 10 8 50 41 20 13 30 Design review data 75 39 20 80 50 50 30 10 11 70 30 34 6 Design effort data 40 31 Code interface dat 65 16 20 60 13 30 70 6 Code complexity data 70 7 20 90 8 30 0 50 6 10 Lines of code dada 80 43 25 [2 100 52 40 60 35 10 Coding effort data 45 20 29 10 70 40 20 19 20 20 26 0 6 Code inspection data 30 40 24 10 10 Fault rates 25 14 10 15 10 30 10 Defert densities 20 15 10 20 30 23 20 10 9 0 Change data 40 28 20 5 70 32 30 50 24 10 Testing effort data 40 75 10 7 60 70 49 20 13 20 15 Fest review data 20 34 30 11 60 17 10 Key: Lach chuy represents the percentage of respondents answering "yes" to the following questions: Question One: Does your organization collect the following werries anta? Question Two: Do you kann, freon personal involvement, that the following metrics data is collected? IS practitioners were very keen on function points, so we asked ten seporately about fonction point penetration. - We asked only about fairly general mercies in order to avoid fragmenting the results.
